Surface or Satellite?

Posted on March 10, 2016 | 7 Comments
This entry was posted in Global Warming. Bookmark the permalink.

7 responses to “Surface or Satellite?”

  1. Everett F Sargent | March 10, 2016 at 3:39 pm |

    Most excellent kick ass video evar!

  2. barry | March 11, 2016 at 12:41 am |

    Very cogent.

    Nice to put faces to names. Zeke is much younger than I had imagined.

  3. JCH | March 11, 2016 at 2:35 am |

    It’s very good, but the video I want to see is the one that dismantles low, observation-based estimates of CS.

  4. Martin | March 11, 2016 at 2:54 pm |

    This is a very well made video. Almost deceptively simple, very clear and no confusion.

  5. Olof R | March 11, 2016 at 6:11 pm |

    Good Video.
    A version of this graph flashed by,

    with uncertainty ensembles demonstrating that the trends of RSS 3.3 is roughly five times more uncertain than that of Hadcrut4.
    It would be interesting to see if the uncertainty ensemble of the new RSS v4 is more narrow than that of the old v3.3. For comparison, the Po Chedley (2015) dataset (tropical TMT) decreased the trend uncertainty interval by half, and restricted it to the upper half of the RSS 3.3 uncertainty interval..

  6. Tad Cook | March 12, 2016 at 4:40 am |

    Not sure where or how to post this. Ran across a slick climate denial video today that features Willie Soon and David Legates. Is this new, or old? How many falacies can you count?

    [Response: As I’ve often said, no embedded video in comments.]

  7. PG Antioch | March 23, 2016 at 8:05 pm |

    Tamino,
    We hope you will be able to update your comparison of the satellite datasets with the RATPAC radiosonde dataset soon. Your last comparison ended in Jul 2015. Thank you!!