Having compensated surface temperature data for el Niño, volcanic aerosols, and solar fluctuations, it’s appropriate I should do the same for satellite temperature data. After all, upper atmosphere temperature (what the satellites estimate) responds to these factors much more strongly than the surface temperature, so it can be argued that it’s more important to compensate satellite data than surface data. Not doing so can cause some very misleading conclusions about temperature trends.
Support Your Global Climate Blog
Recent Comments
Al Rodger on Correlation between CO2 climat… Glen Koehler on Correlation between CO2 climat… Glen Koehler on Correlation between CO2 climat… Glen Koehler on Correlation between CO2 climat… Al Rodger on Correlation between CO2 climat… Ken Fabian on Correlation between CO2 and… Glen Koehler on Correlation between CO2 climat… kinimod on Correlation between CO2 climat… Ned W on Correlation between CO2 climat… bindidon on Correlation between CO2 climat… Al Rodger on Correlation between CO2 climat… Al Rodger on Correlation between CO2 climat… Al Rodger on Correlation between CO2 and… barry on Correlation between CO2 and… jefftweb on Correlation between CO2 climat… -
Recent Posts
Buy the book
astronomy
Blogroll
Global Warming
- Climate Change
- ClimateSight
- Goddard Institute for Space Studies
- GreenFyre’s
- Hadley Center for Climate Change
- History of Global Warming (Spencer Weart)
- IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change)
- James’s Empty Blog
- Maribo
- Old Man in a Cave
- Open Mind Archive on Skeptical Science
- Rabett Run
- RealClimate
mathematics