A recent WUWT post by Richard Lindzen is a rather lame attempt to defend an equally lame opinion piece by Freeman Dyson in the Boston Globe. Evidently, Lindzen felt the need to defend Dyson’s piece because it was rather roundly refuted in a response by 8 members of the faculty of MIT.
Support Your Global Climate Blog
New! Data Analysis Service
Got data? Need analysis? My services are available at reasonable rates. Submit a comment to any thread stating your wishes (I'll keep it confidential). Be sure to include your email address.Recent Comments
drfog on It’s real, it’s us… Peter Prewett on It’s real, it’s us… sailrick on It’s real, it’s us… geoffbeacon on It’s real, it’s us… Aldo A. Bertozzi-Sib… on It’s real, it’s us… Bob Loblaw on How Climate Deniers can… Doc Snow on It’s real, it’s us… Doc Snow on It’s real, it’s us… Doc Snow on It’s real, it’s us… smallbluemike on It’s real, it’s us… smurfix on It’s real, it’s us… Al Rodger on It’s real, it’s us… Martin Smith on It’s real, it’s us… Dave Kahn on It’s real, it’s us… jgnfld on How Climate Deniers can… -
Recent Posts
Buy the book
astronomy
Blogroll
Global Warming
- Climate Change
- ClimateSight
- Goddard Institute for Space Studies
- GreenFyre’s
- Hadley Center for Climate Change
- History of Global Warming (Spencer Weart)
- IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change)
- James’s Empty Blog
- Maribo
- Old Man in a Cave
- Open Mind Archive on Skeptical Science
- Rabett Run
- RealClimate
mathematics
Advertisements