There’s yet another paper debunking the so-called “hiatus” in global temperature, making five so far (of which I’m aware), including one of my own. But this one, in my opinion, isn’t helping. In fact I believe it has some very serious problems, some of which make the idea of “hiatus” too easy to reject, while others make it too hard to reject. Although I agree with their overall conclusion — and published that conclusion before they did — I find their evidence completely unconvincing.
Support Your Global Climate Blog
New! Data Analysis ServiceGot data? Need analysis? My services are available at reasonable rates. Submit a comment to any thread stating your wishes (I'll keep it confidential). Be sure to include your email address.
josh on Judith Curry’s Brain goe… Doc Snow on Global Temperature Update Doc Snow on Global Temperature Update Doc Snow on Judith Curry’s Brain goe… therealbernardj on Global Temperature Update therealbernardj on Night and Day therealbernardj on Zero Hour therealbernardj on Much Ado About Blogging The Very Reverend Je… on Judith Curry’s Brain goe… Chris O'Neill on Judith Curry’s Brain goe… Ed on Global Temperature Update uilyam on Global Warming: Kids Lead dikranmarsupial on Judith Curry’s Brain goe… Chris O'Neill on Judith Curry’s Brain goe… Steve L on Global Warming USA: Patterns o…
Buy the book