There’s yet another paper debunking the so-called “hiatus” in global temperature, making five so far (of which I’m aware), including one of my own. But this one, in my opinion, isn’t helping. In fact I believe it has some very serious problems, some of which make the idea of “hiatus” too easy to reject, while others make it too hard to reject. Although I agree with their overall conclusion — and published that conclusion before they did — I find their evidence completely unconvincing.
Support Your Global Climate Blog
New! Data Analysis ServiceGot data? Need analysis? My services are available at reasonable rates. Submit a comment to any thread stating your wishes (I'll keep it confidential). Be sure to include your email address.
Methane madness on Still Here caveat emptor on Still Here Adrian Burd on Still Here bjchip on Still Here Arvella Oliver on Still Here Glen Koehler on Still Here Gerg (@Gergyl) on Still Here Bob Loblaw on Still Here barry on Still Here climatehawk1 on Still Here jgnfld on Still Here kinimod on Still Here spilgard on Still Here jgnfld on Still Here Susan Anderson on Still Here
Buy the book