In the past I’ve explored simple energy balance models for the evolution of global average temperature. One of the important things to note is that a “1-box” energy balance model — in which the entire climate system is considered to have a single time constant — isn’t really sufficient. It can give a pretty good fit, but for a more realistic estimate you need at least two boxes. One represents rapid response to climate forcing — think of it as the “atmosphere” if you wish. The other is for slower response — think of it as “ocean” if you wish, or as “upper ocean,” or as “everything else.” One could be even more realistic with more than two boxes, after all the deep ocean certainly effects climate but with a longer time scale still, and there’s the cryosphere on top of it all, but rather than go the way of the full-blown computer simulation model, let’s see what happens if we just use a 2-box model with two time constants. We’ll think of box 1 as the atmosphere, so that it should correspond to the surface temperature we’re all familiar with.
Support Your Global Climate Blog
New! Data Analysis ServiceGot data? Need analysis? My services are available at reasonable rates. Submit a comment to any thread stating your wishes (I'll keep it confidential). Be sure to include your email address.
Ken Fabian on Here. Now. Andy Lee Robinson on Here. Now. Kevin O'Neill on Here. Now. Alex C on It’s Global Warming,… A. Physicist on Here. Now. Doc Snow on Here. Now. Timothy Chase on 100% consensus Horatio Algeranon on Here. Now. Dave Werth on Here. Now. Horatio Algeranon on Here. Now. snarkrates on Here. Now. snarkrates on 100% consensus hypergeometric on 100% consensus Dan Andrews on Here. Now. Ron Taylor on 100% consensus
Buy the book