In the past I’ve explored simple energy balance models for the evolution of global average temperature. One of the important things to note is that a “1-box” energy balance model — in which the entire climate system is considered to have a single time constant — isn’t really sufficient. It can give a pretty good fit, but for a more realistic estimate you need at least two boxes. One represents rapid response to climate forcing — think of it as the “atmosphere” if you wish. The other is for slower response — think of it as “ocean” if you wish, or as “upper ocean,” or as “everything else.” One could be even more realistic with more than two boxes, after all the deep ocean certainly effects climate but with a longer time scale still, and there’s the cryosphere on top of it all, but rather than go the way of the full-blown computer simulation model, let’s see what happens if we just use a 2-box model with two time constants. We’ll think of box 1 as the atmosphere, so that it should correspond to the surface temperature we’re all familiar with.
Support Your Global Climate Blog
New! Data Analysis ServiceGot data? Need analysis? My services are available at reasonable rates. Submit a comment to any thread stating your wishes (I'll keep it confidential). Be sure to include your email address.
Ed Hummel on Climate Change: Important… uilyam on Prolonging a NON-slowdown in g… JCH on Climate Deniers’ Top 3… johnrussell40 on Climate Change: Important… John Brookes on Climate Deniers’ Top 3… Doc Snow on Climate Deniers’ Top 3… Al Rodger on Climate Deniers’ Top 3… Raoul on Climate Deniers’ Top 3… Jeffrey Davis on Climate Deniers’ Top 3… u.k(us) on Climate Deniers’ Top 3… robertok06 on Climate Deniers’ Top 3… icarus62 on Climate Deniers’ Top 3… Doc Snow on Climate Deniers’ Top 3… Al Rodger on Climate Deniers’ Top 3… methan madness on Climate Deniers’ Top 3…
Buy the book