Rather a lot, actually.
There’s an interesting graph on the web site of the Univ. of Colorado sea level page comparing de-trended sea level to the multivariate el Niño index:
by Maya Faison
(re-posted from ClimateProgress)
I am 16 years old and I am currently in my home in Laurelton, Queens. It is day six with no heat, no power and no gas in my mom’s car to escape.
In the last post we looked at counts of weather-related natural catstrophes according to Munich Re, the giant re-insurance corporation. It was mentioned that part of the increasing trend could be due to changes in the way catastrophes are counted, and in the number of people and value of property which is susceptible to such catastrophes. Although Munich Re adjusts their classification each decade to account for this, any such attempt is bound to be imperfect.
But it was also pointed out that Munich Re tracks catastrophes which are not weather-related (earthquake, tsunami, volcanic eruption), classifying them as “geophysical.” Do these geophysical events also show a trend? If so, are they increasing as fast as weather-related catastrophes?
Many people have already seen a version of this graph from Munich Re, one of the giants of the re-insurance industry:
Climate Progess has the story. It’s well worth reading.