Not too long ago a post at WUWT examined the most often-used data set for atmospheric CO2 concentration, from the Mauna Loa atmospheric observatory. The post itself is just a curve-fitting exercise, but the author doesn’t make outlandish claims about the significance of his conclusions. What’s disturbing is some of the reader comments, especially from those who don’t want to believe that the CO2 increase has been caused by human beings.
 | realfacepalm on Bet the Farm on Climate |
 | dko on Bet the Farm on Climate |
 | Russell Seitz (@Russ… on Bet the Farm on Climate |
 | Doc Snow on Bet the Farm on Climate |
 | David B. Benson on Bet the Farm on Climate |
 | JCH on Bet the Farm on Climate |
 | Michael D Sweet. on Bet the Farm on Climate |
 | Majura Wombat on Bet the Farm on Climate |
| David B. Benson on Bet the Farm on Climate |
 | Jim Eager on Bet the Farm on Climate |
| Doc Snow on Bet the Farm on Climate |
 | Donald Gisselbeck on Bet the Farm on Climate |
| David B. Benson on Bet the Farm on Climate |
 | Dr Fog on Bet the Farm on Climate |
 | Victor Venema (@Vari… on Bet the Farm on Climate |
