Suppose you’re an astronomer interested in variable stars — stars which change brightness. You decide to collect some data on the brightness of a newly discovered variable. It never gets brighter than magnitude 9, which is too faint to be detected with the naked eye, but you’re at a major observatory so that’s no problem. You have access to, and training in the use of, high-precision CCD photometry so your data will be outstanding. Of course, you can only see it at night and there’s stiff competition for observing time on the observatory telescope, but you manage to schedule regular observations at precisely midnight every 16 days for slightly over a year.
Support Your Global Climate Blog
New! Data Analysis ServiceGot data? Need analysis? My services are available at reasonable rates. Submit a comment to any thread stating your wishes (I'll keep it confidential). Be sure to include your email address.
Andrew Haines on Sea LevelNiño Andy on Climate Denial about Sea … John Brookes on Sea LevelNiño Al Rodger on Climate Denial about Sea … Marco on Climate Denial about Sea … Jim Eager on Climate Denial about Sea … snarkrates on Climate Denial about Sea … Greg Simpson on Climate Denial about Sea … Wayne Job on Climate Denial about Sea … JCH on Sea LevelNiño Jim Hunt on Sea Ice Seasonal Cycle Victor Venema on Sea LevelNiño michael sweet on Sea LevelNiño Li D on Sea LevelNiño snarkrates on Fake Time
Buy the book