A recent post on RealClimate discusses how easy it is to get fooled when analyzing data. It focuses on two recent papers, which critique other papers that go astray in assessing the relationship between solar activity and climate. I’d like to discuss one of those critiques, Legras et al. 2010, A critical look at solar-climate relationships from long temperature series (Climate of the Past, 6, 745-758, doi:10.5194/cp-6-745-2010).
Support Your Global Climate Blog
Recent Comments
Bob Loblaw on COVID-19: Failure Doc Snow on COVID-19: Failure snarkrates on COVID-19: Failure Susan Anderson on COVID-19: Failure Susan Anderson on COVID-19: Failure Kevin Donald McKinne… on COVID-19: Failure Kevin Donald McKinne… on COVID-19: Failure Kevin Donald McKinne… on COVID-19: Failure Kevin Donald McKinne… on COVID-19: Failure Kevin Donald McKinne… on Trump’s Wall Susan Anderson on COVID-19: Failure snarkrates on COVID-19: Failure snarkrates on COVID-19: Failure Wookey on COVID-19: Failure Bob Loblaw on COVID-19: Failure -
Recent Posts
Buy the book
astronomy
Blogroll
Global Warming
- Climate Change
- ClimateSight
- Goddard Institute for Space Studies
- GreenFyre’s
- Hadley Center for Climate Change
- History of Global Warming (Spencer Weart)
- IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change)
- James’s Empty Blog
- Maribo
- Old Man in a Cave
- Open Mind Archive on Skeptical Science
- Rabett Run
- RealClimate
mathematics