As often happens, Eli Rabett has yet another fascinating post, this time about how Barry Bickmore has solved some of the mysteries created by Christopher Monckton. Monckton responded to the expose of his misdeeds the way he usually does: by threatening Bickmore. But you can read about that from the Rabett (honor among bloggers and all that).
Stephan Lewandowsky has posted a rather scathing critique of the paper by McLean, de Freitas, and Carter, a summary of the comment which decapitates it, and now McLean has replied. It seems he finally found a venue where his reply wouldn’t be rejected for the nonsense it is.
Or has he?
Posted in Global Warming
 | Mike Roberts on Global Warming Naive |
 | Doc Snow on Climate Change USA: Seaso… |
 | hypergeometric on Global Warming USA: Patterns o… |
| Doc Snow on Global Warming USA: Patterns o… |
 | therealbernardj on Global Warming Naive |
| Doc Snow on Judith Curry’s Brain goe… |
| Doc Snow on Climate Change USA: Seaso… |
 | 3danim8 (aka Ken Bla… on Climate Change USA: Seaso… |
| Doc Snow on Global Warming Naive |
 | Isaac Trinke Whitt on Global Warming Naive |
 | Chris O'Neill on Global Warming Naive |
 | KiwiGriff on Global Warming Naive |
 | AndyM on Global Warming Naive |
 | geoffbeacon on Climate Change USA: Seaso… |
 | Thomas Everth on Global Warming Naive |
