In the last post I discussed what I thought was a mistaken application of Bayesian analysis. I didn’t claim that Bayesian analysis isn’t appropriate for the problem, in fact I showed the kind of Bayesian analysis which I think is appropriate. But some readers objected to my claims; I think we have some Bayesian zealots out there.
Support Your Global Climate Blog
Recent Comments
Al Rodger on Correlation between CO2 climat… Glen Koehler on Correlation between CO2 climat… Glen Koehler on Correlation between CO2 climat… Glen Koehler on Correlation between CO2 climat… Al Rodger on Correlation between CO2 climat… Ken Fabian on Correlation between CO2 and… Glen Koehler on Correlation between CO2 climat… kinimod on Correlation between CO2 climat… Ned W on Correlation between CO2 climat… bindidon on Correlation between CO2 climat… Al Rodger on Correlation between CO2 climat… Al Rodger on Correlation between CO2 climat… Al Rodger on Correlation between CO2 and… barry on Correlation between CO2 and… jefftweb on Correlation between CO2 climat… -
Recent Posts
Buy the book
astronomy
Blogroll
Global Warming
- Climate Change
- ClimateSight
- Goddard Institute for Space Studies
- GreenFyre’s
- Hadley Center for Climate Change
- History of Global Warming (Spencer Weart)
- IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change)
- James’s Empty Blog
- Maribo
- Old Man in a Cave
- Open Mind Archive on Skeptical Science
- Rabett Run
- RealClimate
mathematics