In the last post I discussed what I thought was a mistaken application of Bayesian analysis. I didn’t claim that Bayesian analysis isn’t appropriate for the problem, in fact I showed the kind of Bayesian analysis which I think is appropriate. But some readers objected to my claims; I think we have some Bayesian zealots out there.
Support Your Global Climate Blog
New! Data Analysis ServiceGot data? Need analysis? My services are available at reasonable rates. Submit a comment to any thread stating your wishes (I'll keep it confidential). Be sure to include your email address.
Andrew Haines on Sea LevelNiño Andy on Climate Denial about Sea … John Brookes on Sea LevelNiño Al Rodger on Climate Denial about Sea … Marco on Climate Denial about Sea … Jim Eager on Climate Denial about Sea … snarkrates on Climate Denial about Sea … Greg Simpson on Climate Denial about Sea … Wayne Job on Climate Denial about Sea … JCH on Sea LevelNiño Jim Hunt on Sea Ice Seasonal Cycle Victor Venema on Sea LevelNiño michael sweet on Sea LevelNiño Li D on Sea LevelNiño snarkrates on Fake Time
Buy the book