Suppose you’re an astronomer interested in variable stars — stars which change brightness. You decide to collect some data on the brightness of a newly discovered variable. It never gets brighter than magnitude 9, which is too faint to be detected with the naked eye, but you’re at a major observatory so that’s no problem. You have access to, and training in the use of, high-precision CCD photometry so your data will be outstanding. Of course, you can only see it at night and there’s stiff competition for observing time on the observatory telescope, but you manage to schedule regular observations at precisely midnight every 16 days for slightly over a year.
Support Your Global Climate Blog
New! Data Analysis Service
Got data? Need analysis? My services are available at reasonable rates. Submit a comment to any thread stating your wishes (I'll keep it confidential). Be sure to include your email address.Recent Comments
snarkrates on Boston John Brookes on Boston Doc Snow on Boston Bob Loblaw on Boston snarkrates on Boston Igor Samoylenko on Boston España on Boston P. Lewis on Worth More than a Thousand… Kevin McKinney on Worth More than a Thousand… Kevin McKinney on Boston jyyh on Boston Bernard J. on Boston David B. Benson on Boston chrisd3 on Worth More than a Thousand… Kevin McKinney on Boston -
Recent Posts
Buy the book
astronomy
Blogroll
Global Warming
- Climate Change
- ClimateSight
- Goddard Institute for Space Studies
- GreenFyre’s
- Hadley Center for Climate Change
- History of Global Warming (Spencer Weart)
- IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change)
- James’s Empty Blog
- Maribo
- Old Man in a Cave
- Open Mind Archive on Skeptical Science
- Rabett Run
- RealClimate
mathematics
