Anthony Watts has published one of his most foolish posts ever, courtesy of Erl Happ. If this is the level of “science” from fake skeptics, then God help us all. But rather than rip the arguments to shreds (taking candy from a baby), I’d like to examine some of the data used, which mostly come from the NCAR/NCEP reanalysis data set.
Support Your Global Climate Blog
New! Data Analysis Service
Got data? Need analysis? My services are available at reasonable rates. Submit a comment to any thread stating your wishes (I'll keep it confidential). Be sure to include your email address.Recent Comments
Doc Snow on GWPF Kevin MacDonald on GWPF John Mashey on GWPF Al Rodger on Bangs and Smoke Hank Roberts on Bangs and Smoke steve fitzpatrick on Bangs and Smoke arch stanton on GWPF Gavin's Pussycat on GWPF Al Rodger on GWPF Timothy (likes zebra… on Bangs and Smoke dhogaza on Bangs and Smoke Susan Anderson on GWPF JCH on GWPF JCH on GWPF JCH on GWPF -
Recent Posts
Buy the book
astronomy
Blogroll
Global Warming
- Climate Change
- ClimateSight
- Goddard Institute for Space Studies
- GreenFyre’s
- Hadley Center for Climate Change
- History of Global Warming (Spencer Weart)
- IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change)
- James’s Empty Blog
- Maribo
- Old Man in a Cave
- Open Mind Archive on Skeptical Science
- Rabett Run
- RealClimate
mathematics
