A reader recently asked my opinion about this post at Skeptical Science, which is a comment on Ambaum 2010, Significance Tests in Climate Science, J. Climate, doi: 10.1175/2010JCLI3746.1.
Support Your Global Climate Blog
New! Data Analysis Service
Got data? Need analysis? My services are available at reasonable rates. Submit a comment to any thread stating your wishes (I'll keep it confidential). Be sure to include your email address.Recent Comments
Nick Stokes on Bangs and Smoke Gavin's Pussycat on Bangs and Smoke snarkrates on Bangs and Smoke cRR Kampen on Bangs and Smoke Chris Colose on Bangs and Smoke Kevin McKinney on GWPF Kevin McKinney on GWPF Gavin's Pussycat on Bangs and Smoke Turboblocke on Bangs and Smoke PeteB on Bangs and Smoke Kevin MacDonald on GWPF dbostrom on Bangs and Smoke Gavin's Pussycat on Bangs and Smoke Doc Snow on GWPF Kevin MacDonald on GWPF -
Recent Posts
Buy the book
astronomy
Blogroll
Global Warming
- Climate Change
- ClimateSight
- Goddard Institute for Space Studies
- GreenFyre’s
- Hadley Center for Climate Change
- History of Global Warming (Spencer Weart)
- IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change)
- James’s Empty Blog
- Maribo
- Old Man in a Cave
- Open Mind Archive on Skeptical Science
- Rabett Run
- RealClimate
mathematics
