Open Mind

Turn it off!

February 6, 2007 · 15 Comments

Like a lot of people, I like to make coffee in the morning. I generally brew about two cups, then drink ‘em slowly over the course of several hours. My coffee-maker keeps them nice and hot. But it occurred to me, that maybe it’s more energy-efficient to turn the coffeemaker off after it’s done brewing, then reheat my coffee in the microwave. Which uses more energy?

The calculation is pretty simple, actually. Electrical devices usually inform you of the amount of power they consume. But power is not the same as energy; power is the rate at which energy is consumed.


The SI (international system) unit of energy is the Joule. One Joule (1 J) is the energy required to take 2 kilograms (2 kg, about 4.4 pounds) of mass, and get it moving at a speed of 1 meter per second (1 m/s, about 2.2 mph). The SI unit of power is the Watt. One watt (1 W) is energy consumption at a rate of one Joule every second (1 W = 1 J/s).

If the power consumption is constant, then you can simply take the power level in watts, multiply it by the length of time in seconds, and you’ll get the energy consumption in Joules. To put it in terms of an equation (gasp!), let “P” be the power level, “T” be the length of time, and “E” be the energy. Then

E = P T

According to the fine print on the bottom of my coffeemaker, it runs at about 650 watts. If I leave it on for one hour (3600 seconds), the energy it consumes is 650 W x 3600 s = 2,340,000 J. My microwave runs at 1000 watts; reheating the coffee takes about 30 seconds. So, to reheat my coffee takes 1000 W x 30 s = 30,000 J. It’s usually about an hour between consuming the 1st cup of coffee and the 2nd. So, if I leave the coffeemaker on so my 2nd cup is hot, it costs 2,340,000 J, but if I simply re-heat it in the microwave it only costs 30,000 J. Therefore, leaving the coffeemaker on takes 78 times as much energy as reheating the 2nd cup in the microwave.

Watts and Joules aren’t the only units for power and energy. A common unit for power is the kilowatt (kW); that’s just 1000 watts. So, my microwave consumes power at a level of 1000 watts, or simply 1 kW — they’re the same power, just different units. A common unit for energy is the kilowatt-hour (kW-h); that’s the energy consumed by running at a power level of 1 kW for a period of 1 hour. Your electric power company probably sends you a bill in which the energy is measured in kW-h. Since 1 kW is 1000 W, and 1 hour is 3600 s, we can compute that 1 kW-h is 1000 W x 3600 s = 3,600,000 J. So, 1 kW-h = 3,600,000 J.

If you live in Great Britain, energy is often expressed in units of British Thermal Units (BTU). If you heat water in a laboratory experiment, energy may be expressed in units of calories. If you’re on a diet, the energy content of food is often expressed in calories, but this is not the same as the calorie used in lab experiments; the food calorie is the laboratory kilocalorie, which is 1000 calories. Here are some commonly used units of energy, and their equivalent in Joules:

  • 1 kilowatt-hour (kW-h) = 3,600,000 J
  • 1 calorie = 4.1868 J
  • 1 food calorie = 4186.8 J
  • 1 British Thermal Unit (BTU) = 1055.06 J.

Let’s compute the energy required for certain activities. Heating water requires about 1 calorie to heat each gram of water by 1oC. For a water heater, the tank temperature should be no less than 130 degrees (Fahrenheit) to prevent bacterial growth. If your water heater raises the water from room temperature (about 68oF, or 20oC) to 131oF (55oC), then you’re increasing its temperature by 55 - 20 = 35oC. That requires 35 calories for each gram of water. Since a gallon of water is about 3785.4 grams, to heat one gallon of water in your water heater requires about 132,489 calories. Since 1 calorie is 4.1868 J, heating the gallon of water takes just about 555,000 J of energy. If you can reduce your hot water consumption by one gallon, you’ll save 555,000 J of energy.

If you raise the temperature of your water heater by 10oF (5.56oC), it requires an additional 88,050 J of energy to heat each gallon of water. If you use 10 gallons of hot water during the day, that’s an additional 880,500 J of energy. And you’ll increase the risk of scalding yourself with the hotter water. If you reduce your water-heater thermostat from 141oF to 131oF, you’ll save 880,500 J of energy.

Suppose you leave a device plugged in on “standby,” and it only consumes power at a very low level, say, a mere 10 watts. If it’s left on all day, that’s a time period of 86,400 seconds. The total energy consumed is 10 W x 86,400 s = 864,000 J. If you unplug the device, you’ll save about 864,000 J of energy.

Suppose you replace a 100 W incandescent light bulb with a much more efficient 15 W compact flourescent light bulb. Running the incandescent bulb for 8 hours requires 100 W x 28,800 s = 2,880,000 J of energy. Running the compact flourescent for the same time period uses only 15 x 28,800 = 432,000 J. This saves 2,880,000 - 432,000 = 2,448,000 J of energy.

I started out with the coffeemaker. Suppose yours runs at 650 watts (like mine), but you like your coffee very hot, so to reheat it you’ll run it in the microwave at 1000 watts for 60 seconds. Leaving the coffeemaker on consumes 2,340,000 J of energy, while reheating it uses only 60,000. If you turn the coffeemaker off and reheat your coffee in the microwave, you’ll save 2,340,000 - 60,000 = 2,280,000 J of energy.

There are lots of other opportunities to conserve energy. Not only will this reduce the energy demand for the nation, and therefore reduce the amount of greenhouse gas created (electric power generation is one of the biggest contributors to greenhouse gases), it’ll save you money as well. The power company measures how much energy you use (usually in kW-h), and that’s how they compute your electric bill. So, turn the thermostat down, turn the lights off when not in use, replace those incandescent bulbs, unplug those devices that are on standby. And if your coffee gets cold because you turned off the coffee maker, just zap it in the microwave for 30 to 60 seconds. It’s good for the planet and good for your wallet. How good does it have to get?

Categories: Global Warming

15 responses so far ↓

  • Alan Woods // February 6, 2007 at 11:39 pm

    What is it with you Americanos and the stewing of coffee? Turn it off alright! Make your coffee in a plunger and then re-heat each cup you pour as required. Think of the planet and think of your taste buds!

  • Henk Lankamp // February 6, 2007 at 11:49 pm

    Using a thermos flask is even better.

  • Peaseblossom // February 7, 2007 at 12:27 am

    Wow.

    You hear people say a lot of the time that these things save energy, but I had no idea just how much!

    I read somewhere once that Thomas Edison kept a note by one of his electric lights that read, “Save the juice! Save the juice! Turn it off when not in use!”

  • Lab Lemming // February 7, 2007 at 6:04 am

    The wattage on the bottom of the coffee pot is probably the maximum power use. If it is simply warming, and not actively brewing, it may be considerably less.
    But Henk has the best idea.

  • Andrew Dodds // February 7, 2007 at 10:27 am

    I can’t help but think that there is a problem here..

    The latent heat of boiling of water is 2.26MJ/kg. Which means if uyou leave 1 liter of coffee in your coffee maker for an hour then it should have boiled completely dry..

    I would suggest that the coffee maker actually has a thermostatic control, or the hotplate runs at a much lower power than the rated 650 watts.

    Assuming thermoststic control at (say) 95 degrees C, then we have to know the rate at which water cools at this temperature. Lets say 3 C/minute, or 1C per 20 seconds; this would actually mean 205J/sec, IIRC.. so the actual power rating usage would be 200W.

    Of course, if you only have a single 250ml mug in there, power usage should average only 50W.

    Obviously, you’d have to measure the actual rate of cooling - but it is very unlikely you are actually saving that much energy.

    Standby usage is another issue - you have to bear in mind that in cold climates, this energy will end up just adding to the heating, and so will not be ‘wasted’, it will be offset - switch everything off and your heating may come on for longer! (Of course, this is a big reason to unplug things in hot climates).

    [Response: I suspect you're right about the coffeemaker, it probably doesn't run at 650 W continuously. As for the cooling rate of the coffee, maybe I'll do some measurements and find out. Of course, it's against my instinct; as a mathematician I'm used to other people doing the measurements while I analyze the numbers ... in other words, I'm used to other people doing the work while I have the fun!]

  • tamino // February 7, 2007 at 3:30 pm

    I did a quick-and-dirty experiment. With 440ml of coffee in the pot, and no heat source, it cools at about 0.9 deg.C/min. That’s an energy loss rate of about 28 W.

    Sustained for an hour, it’s 99,500 J, whereas heating it in the microwave for 30 s at 1000 W consumes 30,000 J. Net saving: 69,500 J. That’s a far cry from the 2.3 MJ computed using a constant 650W rate! But it’s still a savings.

  • matthew // February 7, 2007 at 5:59 pm

    I highly, highly recomend this carafe: http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B0000X7CMQ/ref=cm_taf_title_featured/103-2045767-9499800?n=284507 . I have it, my parents have it, and I have only ever read good things about it.

  • Lynn Vincentnathan // February 7, 2007 at 7:29 pm

    I’ve been doing that forever (turning off the coffee-maker after brewing). Also for safety reasons — it could cause problems if left on by mistake.

    What about turning off the car in drive-thrus. I also do that. I understand that there’s a slight jump in fuel to turn it back on. I’ve heard that if you’re going to be stopped for more than 30 seconds, it’s better to turn it off (tho I wouldn’t recommend that at stop lights). And, of course, one usually doesn’t have to gun the car while turning it on; just a turn of the key often works.

  • djangone // February 8, 2007 at 7:10 am

    Barbarians! Vive le French Press! Buy fresh-roasted beans in quarter-pound quantities, grind only before use (oops, some power usage there), then decant into a thermos. Leaving aside the conservation benefits, the difference in flavor is astounding. Considering how quickly coffee flavors go stale in contact with oxygen, people in the coffee business doubt one in ten of Americans have ever enjoyed a genuinely fresh cup of coffee.

  • Lynn Vincentnathan // February 9, 2007 at 9:46 pm

    Another way, cold-filtered coffee. I used to have a set up for that. You let the coffee soak in water, then filter it, and save the decoction in the frig, then mix a small portion with water & heat in the microwave when you want a cup. It filters out the bitterness. Maybe I should get back to that.

  • Peaseblossom // February 10, 2007 at 1:43 am

    I just drink tea. Heh.

  • Eli Rabett // February 10, 2007 at 3:58 am

    Depends if it is heating or cooling season, in the later case I tend to drink cold tea or coffee anyhow.

  • kennebecriver // February 14, 2007 at 8:37 am

    My power company told me this about electric coffeemakers 6 years ago. Brew it, have a cup, turn it off, then microwave it for a minute. Or best yet, use a thermos. I started saving $30 a month on my electric bill by doing this.

    Doug Watts

  • Eli Rabett // February 14, 2007 at 4:16 pm

    Don’t quite know how I forgot about it as I used to brew this way, and I don’t really remember why I stopped, but cold brewing coffee works, the coffee is a lot less acid and this is ideal if you like iced coffee. Basically you put the coffee into a jar and add water and let it sit overnight. This makes a very strong coffee syrup. You pour some into your cup through a filter, add hot or cold water depending if you want hot or iced coffee. Very fast, very economical.

    For those looking for something fancy to do it you can get them too. Here is a newspaper article on the method, which is very popular in Latin America

  • Eli Rabett // February 14, 2007 at 4:17 pm

    Sorry, I missed Lynn’s comment somehow.

Leave a Comment